Road Safety News

GEM calls for compulsory eyesight testing for all drivers

Tuesday 5th January 2016

GEM Motoring Assist is the latest road safety organisation to call on the Government to introduce compulsory eyesight testing for all drivers at regular intervals.

Last month (Dec 2015), Road Safety GB supported a call from a leading ophthalmologist urging drivers to undergo regular eye tests to ensure they have a clear view of the road, especially in the winter months.

David Teenan, UK medical director at Optical Express, stated that longer nights, low sun and treacherous weather can significantly impede the sight of drivers – causing temporary blindness in some cases.

GEM believes that a detailed test of a driver’s visual acuity and field of view should be required every 10 years and says that better regulation of eyesight tests for drivers would cut collisions and make Britain’s roads safer.

David Williams MBE, GEM chief executive, said: “We are worried that a large number of drivers have not had their eyes tested for many years – and some have never had a test.

“Many of us assume our vision is fine and does not require a check-up; however we have no way of knowing this for sure. That’s why it’s so important for road safety that the Government take steps to ensure regular, compulsory testing for all drivers.

“We believe it is unacceptable to operate a system where a driver can read a number plate aged 17 and carry on driving for 50 years or more without any eyesight check whatsoever.

“Along with many road safety organisations, we believe everyone should undergo a compulsory, professional eyesight test when applying for a provisional licence, with a further test every 10 years after that.”

GEM also says that the current ‘number plate’ eyesight test, introduced to the driving test in 1937, is ‘crude and outdated’, as it only measures visual acuity (sharpness).

David Williams MBE added: “The time has come to accept that the current driver eyesight test simply isn’t fit for purpose. What’s more, it is certainly no longer acceptable for drivers to self-certify.

“As more and more people are staying behind the wheel into their eighties and beyond, the need for mandatory eyesight testing has never been more pressing.”


Comment on this story
Report a reader comment

What's your view - comment on this story:

I confirm that I have read and accept the moderation policy and house rules relating to comments posted on this website.
Your comment:
Your name and location:
Your email:
Captcha [What is this?]

I once came across a statistic that claimed that 7% of UK full licence holders had eyesight poor enough to qualify them to classified as blind. Of course, that does not mean that 7% of the vehicles we meet are driven blind, because such drivers will probably drive no more than a handful of miles per week to visit the shops, or doctor's surgery, etc., but they are out there. The system of self-declaration does not work, and needs to be fixed.
David, Suffolk

Agree (15) | Disagree (0)

Surely it makes sense for everyone to have their eyesight tested regularly, not just riders or drivers? An eyesight test can detect health problems such as high blood pressure, glaucoma, cataracts and diabetes.
Paul Biggs, Tamworth

Agree (19) | Disagree (1)

Yes the current test is not really fit for purpose and more needs to be done but we also need to test cyclists eyesight. I have observed the bike ability training where adults are asked to tell how many fingers an instructor holds up to show the trainee is looking behind. Bikeability say that is their eyesight test. Even if a number plate test were to be done this would be better than what currently happens. Imagine a trainee having an incident and subsequently it is discovered their eyesight was poor and the instructor did not check this. Where would the trainer, the company or the LA overseeing training stand? Let's not just test drivers but cyclists as well and as GEM suggests every 10 years.
Peter City of Westminster

Agree (6) | Disagree (2)

I agree with the proposal. The current policy has no logic. We don't trust people to self declare before we give them a license but we trust them for the next 50 years or more. This is not a safe system. As a quick calc let's assume there are around 20 million drivers who would need to be tested every 10 years - this is around 2 million a year. But of these around 60-70% (College of Optometrists figures) will have been wearing glasses and already have been tested. So the annual population of new tests would be a few hundred thousand per year. In cost terms this is very small and has other health benefits away from driving. Many opticians offer a free test if you buy your glasses with them. Even at full cost this is a small price to pay for safety and health.

[Interesting facts if you google "Britainís Eye Health in Focus"]
pete, liverpool

Agree (13) | Disagree (2)